Alcoholic Liver Disease: Pathogenesis and Current Management

Excessive alcohol consumption is a global healthcare problem with enormous social, economic, and clinical consequences, accounting for 3.3 million deaths in 2012 (World Health Organization 2014). Excessive drinking over decades damages nearly every organ in the body. However, the liver sustains the earliest and the greatest degree of tissue injury from excessive drinking because it is the primary site of ethanol metabolism (Lieber 2000). After a brief overview of alcohol metabolism in the liver, this article will summarize the mechanisms through which excessive alcohol consumption contributes to the development of various types of alcohol-induced liver damage. It also will review modifiers of alcoholic liver disease (ALD) and discuss currently used treatment approaches for patients with ALD.

Hepatic Alcohol Metabolism

Beverage alcohol (i.e., ethanol) is chiefly metabolized in the main parenchymal cells of the liver (i.e., hepatocytes) that make up about 70 percent of the liver mass (Jones 1996). These cells express the highest levels of the major ethanol-oxidizing enzymes, alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), which is located in the cytosol, and cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1), which resides in the smooth endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (figure 1). Hepatocytes also express very high levels of catalase, an enzyme that inhabits peroxisomes. Catalase normally carries out the detoxification of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) to water and oxygen. However, when ethanol is present, catalase has an accessory role in ethanol metabolism by using H2O2 to oxidize ethanol to acetaldehyde. Ethanol oxidation by catalase is a relatively minor pathway in the liver, but has a larger ethanol-oxidizing function in the brain (Aragon et al. 1992).

Image

ADH is the most catalytically efficient ethanol-metabolizing enzyme. It reaches its half-maximal velocity when circulating ethanol levels are about 5 to 10 milligrams per deciliter, well below levels that cause intoxication.¹ADH-catalyzed ethanol oxidation uses nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) as a cofactor, generating reduced NAD+ (NADH) and acetaldehyde. The latter compound is highly reactive and toxic. It can covalently bind to proteins (Donohue et al. 1983), lipids (Kenney 1982), and nucleic acids (Brooks and Zakhari 2014) to form acetaldehyde adducts, which, in turn, can disrupt the structure and function of these macromolecules (Mauch et al. 1986). One way that hepatocytes minimize acetaldehyde toxicity is by rapidly oxidizing it to acetate using the enzyme aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) inside mitochondria. The ALDH2 reaction is another oxidation–reduction step that generates NADH and acetate, the latter of which can diffuse into the circulation to be utilized in other metabolic pathways. The enhanced generation of NADH by both ADH- and ALDH2-catalyzed reactions decreases the normal intrahepatocyte NAD+/NADH ratio, called the cellular redox potential. This change causes significant metabolic shifts from oxidative metabolism toward reductive synthesis, favoring the formation of fatty acids, which contribute to fatty liver development (Donohue 2007).

---

¹_{People are legally inebriated when their blood alcohol levels reach 80 milligrams per deciliter.}

CYP2E1 is the other major hepatic enzyme that catalyzes ethanol oxidation to acetaldehyde. Although the catalytic efficiency of CYP2E1 is considerably slower than that of ADH, CYP2E1 has a 10-fold higher capacity for binding ethanol, becoming half-saturated at 46 to 92 milligrams per deciliter. Also important is that CYP2E1 is an inducible enzyme; its hepatocellular content rises during chronic ethanol consumption (Dilger et al. 1997; Lieber and DeCarli 1968). Ethanol interacts directly with the CYP2E1 protein, causing it to assume a conformation that resists degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome system and resulting in the accumulation of CYP2E1 molecules (Roberts et al. 1995). CYP2E1 induction has several major effects in heavy drinkers: First, because more CYP2E1 oxidizes ethanol, drinkers develop a “metabolic tolerance”—that is, they need to drink more alcohol to reach a level of intoxication that they formerly achieved after drinking less alcohol. Second, accelerated alcohol metabolism by higher levels of CYP2E1 puts liver cells in metabolic peril, because more CYP2E1 not only produces more acetaldehyde, but the induced enzyme also generates greater amounts of various other reactive oxygen species (ROS), including hydroxyethyl radicals (i.e., free-radical forms of ethanol), superoxide anions (O2–) and hydroxyl radicals (∙OH). Continuous generation of these reactive molecules in problem drinkers eventually creates the condition known as oxidant stress or oxidative stress. Under these conditions, the rate of ROS generation exceeds the liver’s capacity to neutralize them with natural antioxidants, such as glutathione and vitamins E, A, and C, or to remove them using antioxidant enzymes, including those listed in table 1 (Fang et al. 2002). Animal studies have revealed that chronic ethanol consumption decreases the activities and/or amounts of several antioxidant enzymes, which worsens the hepatocytes’ oxidant burden (Chen et al. 1995; Dong et al. 2014; Zhao et al. 1996). Oxidant stress further is exacerbated when the generated ROS undergo secondary reactions with proteins and unsaturated lipids. The latter reactions result in the generation of lipid peroxides, which themselves interact with proteins and with acetaldehyde to form bulkier adducts (e.g., malondialdehyde-acetaldehyde [MAA] adducts) that are capable of generating an immune response (Tuma et al. 1996). Finally, because of CYP2E1’s broad substrate specificity, increased levels of the enzyme also accelerate the conversion of excess amounts of substrates other than ethanol, such as the analgesic and antipyretic medication acetaminophen. Following CYP2E1 induction by heavy drinking, acetaminophen is converted to a more toxic, reactive intermediate. This places the chronic drinker at substantial risk for liver disease or acute liver failure, especially after an acetaminophen overdose (Schiodt et al. 2002).

Table 1 Hepatic Enzymatic Defenses Against Free-Radical Attack

Alcohol’s Effects on Other Liver Cell Types

Although hepatocytes comprise most of the liver mass, nonparenchymal cells, including Kupffer cells (KCs), sinusoidal endothelial cells, hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), and liver-associated lymphocytes make up the remaining 15 to 30 percent of the liver mass. These nonparenchymal cells interact with hepatocytes and with each other via soluble mediators and by direct cell-to-cell contact. Each liver cell type plays a specific role not only in normal hepatic physiology but also in initiating and perpetuating liver injury.

Spectrum of ALD

Heavy ethanol consumption produces a wide spectrum of hepatic lesions, the most characteristic being fatty liver (i.e., steatosis), hepatitis, and fibrosis/cirrhosis (see figure 2). Steatosis is the earliest, most common response that develops in more than 90 percent of problem drinkers who consume 4 to 5 standard drinks per day over decades (Ishak et al. 1991; Lieber 2004). (A standard drink is defined as the amount of alcoholic beverage that contains approximately 0.5 fluid ounces, or about 14 grams, of pure alcohol [figure 3]). However, steatosis also develops after binge drinking, defined as the consumption of 4 to 5 drinks in 2 hours or less. Steatosis was formerly considered a benign consequence of alcohol abuse. It is characterized by the deposition of fat, seen microscopically as lipid droplets, initially in the hepatocytes that surround the liver’s central vein (i.e., perivenular hepatocytes), then progressing to mid-lobular hepatocytes, and finally to the hepatocytes that surround the hepatic portal vein (i.e., periportal hepatocytes). If the affected individual ceases drinking, steatosis is a reversible condition with a good prognosis. However, patients with chronic steatosis are more susceptible to fibrotic liver disease (Teli et al. 1995), because the presence of fat likely represents a greater risk for lipid peroxidation and oxidative damage.

 

Image

 

Image

Alcoholic hepatitis is a more severe, inflammatory type of liver injury characterized by swollen, dying hepatocytes (i.e., ballooning degeneration), neutrophilic infiltration, and the development of tangled aggregates of insoluble proteins called Mallory-Denk bodies within hepatocytes. Central to hepatitis development is the activation of KCs, the resident liver macrophages.

Fibrosis and its terminal or late stage, cirrhosis, refer to the deposition of abnormal amounts of extracellular matrix proteins, principally by activated HSCs. Patients initially exhibit active pericellular fibrosis, which may progress to cirrhosis, the late stage of hepatic scarring. However, some degree of hepatitis likely is always present in cirrhotic patients, whereas hepatic fat usually is not prominent in these individuals. The World Health Organization’s (2014) Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health estimates that 50 percent of all deaths caused by cirrhosis were attributable to alcohol abuse.

The following sections provide a detailed description of the mechanisms involved in the development of these major lesions.

Mechanisms Involved in Alcoholic Steatosis

As the preceding section on ethanol metabolism stated, ethanol and acetaldehyde oxidations generate higher levels of NADH, which alters the cellular redox potential and enhances lipid synthesis (i.e., lipogenesis). However, ethanol-induced redox change alone does not fully explain why the liver rapidly accumulates fat. More recent studies now strongly support the notion that ethanol-induced steatosis is multifactorial as discussed below (see figure 4).

 

Image

Alcohol Accelerates Hepatic Lipogenesis

Enhanced lipid synthesis results from a higher expression of lipogenic enzymes and cytokines (see table 2) that are encoded by genes regulated by two transcription factors, sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c) and early growth response-1 (Egr-1). SREBP-1c belongs to a family of transcription factors that control hepatic cholesterol metabolism. However, in heavy drinkers, ethanol oxidation short-circuits hepatic lipid metabolism, converting the liver from a lipid-burning to a lipid-storing organ. Thus, hepatic SREBP-1c is relatively inactive in hepatocytes of abstinent people, residing mostly in the ER. However, in a person who binges or habitually drinks, hepatic ethanol oxidation triggers the translocation of SREBP-1c from the ER to the Golgi apparatus, where it undergoes proteolytic maturation to its active form, generating a transcriptionally active SREBP protein fragment that enters the nucleus and enhances lipogenic gene expression (see table 2). Egr-1 controls the expression of genes that respond to cellular stress. It binds to gene promoter regions that are relevant to alcohol-induced liver injury and steatosis. The most notable of these is tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), a lipogenic cytokine. Additionally, because Egr-1 is activated very early after ethanol administration (Donohue et al. 2012), it also regulates the expression of the SREBP-1c gene (Thomes et al. 2013). Figure 5 shows the postulated scheme of transcriptional control that contributes to enhanced lipogenesis in the liver.

Table 2 Lipogenic Enzymes Regulated by SREBP-1c

Image

In addition to enhanced hepatic lipogenesis, fat (i.e., adipose) tissue contributes to the development of steatosis. Adipose tissue normally is an important energy depot, storing excess calories derived from food consumption as fat. When necessary, high-energy fat then can be used to fulfill energy requirements during times of low nutrition (e.g., fasting) or high calorie utilization (e.g., exercise). Research with rodents subjected to chronic alcohol feeding has shown that ethanol consumption reduces adipose tissue mass by enhancing fat breakdown (i.e., lipolysis) in adipose tissue (Kang et al. 2007; Wang et al. 2016; Wei et al. 2013). The free fatty acids released from adipose tissue are taken up by the liver and esterified into triglycerides, thereby exacerbating fat accumulation in the liver (Wei et al. 2013). Clinical studies also have demonstrated that people with alcohol use disorder who have fatty liver have significantly lower body weight, body mass index, and body-fat mass content than control subjects (Addolorato et al. 1997, 1998).

Alcohol Decelerates Hepatic Lipid Breakdown

Because most lipids in hepatocytes are stored in lipid droplets, these organelles must first be degraded to extract the lipids for their subsequent oxidation. Breakdown of lipid droplets is accomplished by lipophagy, a specialized form of the intracellular process that degrades cytoplasmic components (i.e., autophagy). During lipophagy, lipid droplets are engulfed within double-membrane–bound vacuoles called autophagosomes. These vacuoles transport the lipid-droplet cargo to lysosomes, where they are degraded by lipid-digesting enzymes (i.e., lipases), releasing free fatty acids that then undergo β-oxidation inside mitochondria. The rates of autophagy reportedly are retarded by chronic ethanol consumption, at least in part because ethanol is thought to cause faulty lysosome biogenesis. This results in fewer, more defective lysosomes (Kharbanda et al. 1995, 1996), thereby slowing the breakdown of lipid droplets in the steatotic liver.

It also is quite clear that once fatty acids are released from lipid droplets, heavy alcohol consumption reduces their rates of β-oxidation. There are several reasons for the slowdown: First, the enhanced generation of NADH by ethanol oxidation inhibits mitochondrial β-oxidation. Second, metabolically generated acetaldehyde inactivates the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha (PPAR-α), a transcription factor that acts in concert with the retinoid X receptor (RXR) and governs expression of genes that regulate fatty-acid transport and oxidation. Acetaldehyde likely inactivates PPAR-α by covalently binding to the transcription factor (Galli et al. 2001), thereby blocking its ability to recognize and/or bind PPAR-α promoter sequences. Third, both acute and chronic ethanol oxidation cause mitochondrial depolarization, impairing their abilities to generate energy (i.e., adenosine triphosphate [ATP] molecules), and causing their outer membranes to leak, resulting in inefficient fatty-acid import and lower rates of
β-oxidation (Zhong et al. 2014). Fourth, ethanol consumption reduces the production of the hormone adiponectin, which is secreted by fat cells (i.e., adipocytes). One study demonstrated that the restoration of adiponectin to alcohol-fed animals re-establishes fatty-acid oxidation to normal (Xu et al. 2003). In addition, adiponectin appears to reduce the production of the cytokine TNFα, and there is evidence that TNFα also may regulate adiponectin production (You and Crabb 2004).

Alcohol Causes Defective Hepatic Lipid Export

It is well known that the liver exports triglycerides and cholesterol only as constituents of very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) particles; any impairment in either the synthesis or export of VLDL particles therefore contributes to fat accumulation within hepatocytes. VLDL assembly is regulated by the availability of triglycerides (which make up more than 50 percent of the VLDL lipids) stored in cytoplasmic lipid droplets. Up to 70 percent of the triglycerides in VLDLs are derived from the pool of triglycerides stored in lipid droplets that first undergo lipolysis and then are re-esterified to constitute VLDL triglycerides. Although earlier reports implicated altered VLDL secretion in the development of alcoholic steatosis (Venkatesan et al. 1988), exactly how alcohol impairs lipolysis of triglyceride stores in lipid droplets for assembly of VLDL and its subsequent secretion is unknown. However, studies have shown that alcohol-impaired VLDL secretion is caused by a decreased synthesis of an essential constituent of VLDL (Kharbanda et al. 2007, 2009) as well as by reduced activity of an essential protein for its assembly (Shearn et al. 2016; Sugimoto et al. 2002).

Mechanisms Involved in Alcoholic Hepatitis

Alcoholic hepatitis occurs in about 30 to 40 percent of individuals reporting chronic alcohol abuse. It represents the most serious form of ALD and is associated with high short-term mortality. Ballooning degeneration of hepatocytes containing Mallory-Denk bodies, infiltrating neutrophils, and fibrosis are characteristic pathologic findings indicative of hepatitis (Lefkowitch 2005). Central to the progression of alcoholic hepatitis are resident and infiltrating immune cells called macrophages, which have important roles in inducing liver inflammation. KCs, the resident macrophages in the liver, represent up to 15 percent of liver cells and 50 percent of all macrophages in the body. They reside in the liver sinusoids and provide the first line of defense, serving as potent innate immune cells. In contrast, infiltrating macrophages are recruited as immature cells from the bone marrow, and their differentiation into macrophages in the liver only occurs during inflammation.

The ability of macrophages to regulate inflammation depends on their polarization—that is, their ability to develop into one of two different functional states, namely M1 (i.e., proinflammatory) or M2 (i.e., anti- inflammatory) macrophages. The polarization to either phenotype depends on the microenvironment, including circulating growth factors, cytokines, and pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP) as well as damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) molecules. Because the liver is exposed to countless antigens, pathogens, and toxic substances that come from the intestine via the portal circulation, it must be protected from developing an immune response to such exposure. As a result, KCs usually have tolerogenic properties, meaning that they do not respond to all antigens with an immune response. However, excessive alcohol exposure can switch KCs to a proinflammatory M1 phenotype. Usually, ALD progression from liver steatosis to inflammation requires a second insult in addition to the alcohol exposure, such as another toxic insult, nutritional factor, or viral infection (Tsukamoto et al. 2009). More importantly, KCs can regulate the development of inflammation, depending on their ability to either induce or suppress proinflammatory changes. These effects are related to the stage and severity of the alcoholic hepatitis; in severe cases, KCs differentiate to the proinflammatory M1 phenotype, whereas in mild forms, KCs switch to the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype. As inducers of inflammation, KCs release multiple proinflammatory cytokines, including TNFα, interleukins, and chemokines that attract inflammatory cells from circulation. KCs also are an abundant source of ROS that exacerbate oxidative stress in the liver.

What factors trigger KC activity in patients with alcohol use disorder? One major factor is endotoxin, also called lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a cell-wall component of Gram-negative bacteria that translocates from the gut lumen into the portal circulation to reach the liver (figure 6). Accumulating data demonstrate that excess ethanol intake induces endotoxemia through two main mechanisms—by stimulating bacterial overgrowth and by increasing intestinal permeability (Bode and Bode 2003). Animal studies have revealed that increased circulating endotoxin levels correlate with the severity of liver disease (Mathurin et al. 2000). LPS is sensed by two types of receptors—CD14 and toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)—on the KC surface (Suraweera et al. 2015). These receptors activate KCs to produce proinflammatory cytokines and promote free-radical formation via induction of the reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase and CYP2E1. The resulting reactive oxygen and nitrogen species promote the release of pro- inflammatory cytokines, which in turn increase inflammasome activation in KCs and the release of chemokines that attract circulating immune cells to the liver. Inflammasomes are innate immune-system sensors that regulate the activation of caspase-1 and induce inflammation in response to microbial/viral pathogens, molecules derived from host proteins, and toxic insults (e.g., alcohol exposure).

 

Image

Other factors can exacerbate liver inflammation. Prominent among these are MAA adducts that are produced in alcohol-exposed hepatocytes. These adducts are taken up by scavenger receptors on KCs (Ambade and Mandrekar 2012), further promoting the proinflammatory response. Also, because macrophages metabolize ethanol via CYP2E1, the induction of oxidative stress by alcohol exposure activates macrophage-dependent release of proinflammatory cytokines, including TNFα. Although hepatocytes normally are resistant to TNFα, alcohol exposure sensitizes them to the cytokine, causing their death via apoptosis. The resulting release of small vesicles (i.e., exosomes) from dying hepatocytes provides activation signals to KCs (Nagy et al. 2016). Apoptotic hepatocytes are engulfed by KCs, thereby switching their phenotype to M1, which exacerbates inflammation. Inflammation-associated release of chemokines, in turn, attracts circulating macrophages, T-cells, and neutrophils (an additional source of oxidative stress) to the liver. These immune cells, by releasing proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines with direct cytotoxic effects, further promote hepatocyte cell death and the persistence of alcoholic hepatitis.

Recently, it was reported that HSCs also play a dual (i.e., stage-dependent) role in the regulation of liver inflammation (Fujita et al. 2016). An important function of HSCs is to transmit signals from sinusoid cells to the liver parenchyma. The proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines produced by activated KCs stimulate the production of proinflammatory cytokines by HSCs. In addition, LPS also can directly activate HSCs through TLR4 to promote the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines. The functions of HSCs are regulated by KCs. The dual role of KCs in the regulation of inflammation is not only related to production of proinflammatory substances. At the stage of the resolution of inflammation, KCs produce anti- inflammatory substances, such as prostaglandin D2, which is sensed by HSC receptors. Prostaglandin D2 programs HSCs to switch their production to anti-inflammatory factors, including transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), which promotes fibrogenesis. The role of KCs and HSCs in promoting alcohol-induced inflammatory changes and progression to fibrosis/cirrhosis is schematically presented in figure 7.

 

Image

Mechanisms Involved in Fibrosis/Cirrhosis

HSCs are the key players in the development of fibrosis. These cells normally reside in the space of Disse as quiescent, lipid (retinyl-ester)-storing cells (figure 8). Following hepatic injury, HSCs undergo a complex activation process (figure 9) and become the principal source for the increased and irregular deposition of extracellular-matrix components that characterize fibrosis. Activated HSCs also contribute to the inflammatory response, coordinating the recruitment and stimulation of leukocytes by releasing chemokines and proinflammatory cytokines as well as expressing adhesion molecules. The leukocytes, in turn, not only attack and destroy hepatocytes, but also activate quiescent and activated HSCs, thereby exacerbating the fibrogenic response (Friedman 2008).

 

Image

 

Image

Hepatic fibrosis is a transient and reversible wound-healing response, which may be restored to normal in some patients if alcohol intake ceases. However, if drinking continues, chronic inflammation and sustained fibrogenesis progress, resulting in the substitution of liver parenchyma by scar tissue that severely compromises the liver’s vascular architecture. The main pathological feature of cirrhosis is the formation of regenerative nodules of hepatic parenchyma surrounded by fibrous septa. Cirrhosis development progresses from a compensated phase, in which part of the liver remains undamaged and functionally compensates for the damaged regions, to a decompensated phase, in which scar tissue fully envelops the organ. The latter is characterized by development of portal hypertension and/or liver failure.

Modifiers of ALD Risk

Among problem drinkers, only about 35 percent develop advanced liver disease. This is because modifiers, as listed below, exist that exacerbate, slow, or prevent ALD disease progression.

• Pattern of Consumption and Beverage Type. The most important factors determining the progression of liver disease are the beverage type consumed and the amount and pattern of drinking (e.g., outside mealtime or binges). Intake of 40 to 80 grams ethanol/day by males and of 20 to 40 grams/day by females for 10 to 12 years is a general predictor of more severe cases of ALD, including alcoholic steatohepatitis, fibrosis, and cirrhosis (Becker et al. 1996).
• Gender. Epidemiologic data show that women are more susceptible to alcohol-related liver damage than men. This appears to be related to higher blood alcohol concentrations in women than in men who ingest the same amount of alcohol, resulting from a lower proportion of body water in females compared with males of equal weight (Mumenthaler et al. 1999). There also are reports that women possess a lower capacity than men to oxidize ethanol in the gut, a process called first-pass metabolism (Frezza et al. 1990). This deficit in women allows greater quantities of ethanol into the portal circulation, thereby exposing their livers to higher ethanol concentrations. Further, gender-based differences in the sensitivity of KCs to endotoxins and hepatic inflammatory responses have been related to higher susceptibility to ALD progression in females than in males (Frezza et al. 1990).
• Age. It is not completely clear how age modifies ALD progression. It is, however, a predictor for ALD (Masson et al. 2014), because older adults (i.e., ages 65 and up) are more vulnerable to and show greater degrees of ethanol-induced impairments than younger people (Meier and Seitz 2008).
• Race/Ethnicity. Ethnicity is a major factor affecting the age at and severity of presentation of different subtypes of ALD (Levy et al. 2015). The reason(s) for these differences are not clear.
• Genetics. Both genetic and epigenetic influences govern the initiation and progression of ALD. Genome-wide association studies have identified specific genetic markers (i.e., single-nucleotide polymorphisms) in genes encoding alcohol-metabolizing enzymes, cytokines, and antioxidant enzymes that are related to the progression of ALD (Stickel and Hampe 2012). Most recently, an allele of patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 3 (PNPLA3 I148M), a triglyceride-degrading enzyme, was identified as an independent risk factor for alcoholic cirrhosis (Anstee et al. 2016; Burza et al. 2014).
• Nutritional Factors. Dietary fat is a macronutrient and dietary modifier for ALD. In rodents, dietary saturated fat seems to protect against alcohol-induced liver damage, whereas dietary unsaturated fat that is enriched in linoleic acid reportedly promotes such damage (Kirpich et al. 2016).
• Drugs. Alcohol and other drugs (including prescription medications, over-the-counter agents, and illicit drugs) interact to enhance hepatotoxicity. For example, as described earlier, acetaminophen hepatotoxicity can be exacerbated by alcohol abuse.
• Obesity. Population-based studies have indicated a significant correlation between the risk of liver damage and alcohol consumption in people with a high body mass index (Ruhl and Everhart 2005).
• Smoking. Cigarette smoking can adversely affect certain hepatic functions and is associated with higher risk of alcoholic cirrhosis in humans (Klatsky and Armstrong 1992).
• Viral Infections. The course of hepatitis C (HCV) and hepatitis B (HBV) viral infections is worsened in alcohol-abusing patients, causing rapid progression to fibrosis, cirrhosis, and even hepatocellular carcinoma (Szabo et al. 2006). Several common mechanisms of viral infection and alcohol-induced damage have been suggested (Zakhari 2013); however, the exact mechanisms for this rapid disease progression are not completely understood. Because viral infections such as HCV or HBV affect more than 170 million people worldwide (Gitto et al. 2014), the following section will describe this topic in greater detail.

HCV and Alcohol

HCV and alcohol are the two most widespread causes of liver disease worldwide. Almost all patients with a history of both HCV infection and alcohol abuse develop chronic liver injury. Some studies report that 16.9 percent of HCV-infection cases progress to liver cirrhosis, which is twice the prevalence of cirrhosis from alcoholic liver disease. In HCV-positive alcohol abusers, cirrhosis prevalence is even higher at 27.2 percent (Khan and Yatsuhashi 2000). A daily intake of 80 grams of alcohol increases liver-cancer risk 5-fold over that of nondrinkers, whereas heavy alcohol use by HCV-infected individuals increases cancer risk by 100-fold over uninfected heavy drinkers.

There are multiple mechanisms by which alcohol potentiates HCV-infection pathogenesis. For example, HCV proteins induce oxidative stress by binding to the outer membranes of mitochondria, stimulating electron transport and increasing the generation of cellular ROS (e.g., superoxide) (Otani et al. 2005). Coupled with the ethanol-induced depletion of the antioxidant glutathione and ROS-induced suppression of proteasome activity, this compromises cell viability (Osna et al. 2008), causing hepatocyte apoptosis (Ganesan et al. 2015; Siu et al. 2009). Ethanol-induced oxidative stress also causes mutations in the HCV genome that increase resistance to interferon (IFN) treatment, the former standard of care for HCV (Seronello et al. 2011). Only 9 percent of HCV-infected people with alcohol use disorder respond to IFNα therapy. There currently is little information on whether heavy drinking affects the outcomes of HCV treatment with the new generation of antiviral agents (Keating 2015).

Ethanol metabolites appear to stimulate HCV replication. CYP2E1-positive hepatoma cells exposed to ethanol show an increase in HCV RNA (McCartney et al. 2008). However, this rise is only temporarily sustained (Seronello et al. 2007), because these heavily infected cells eventually die by apoptosis (Ganesan et al. 2015). The resulting cell fragments (i.e., apoptotic bodies) contain infectious HCV particles that spread the virus to uninfected cells, causing the production of proinflammatory cytokines by phagocytosing KCs (Ganesan et al. 2016). In addition to apoptotic bodies, another type of cell-derived vesicles (i.e., exosomes) that leak from dead cells enhances intracellular HCV replication in neighboring cells through an exosomal micro-RNA (miRNA 122). Because ethanol exposure also increases hepatic miRNA 122 levels (Bala et al. 2012), HCV replication in problem drinkers likely is augmented (Ganesan et al. 2016).

Innate immunity is the first line of antiviral protection in the liver. HCV commandeers this line of defense, and ethanol metabolism potentiates its takeover. For example, activation of antiviral IFNβ production in liver cells occurs via the interferon regulatory factor 3 pathway, which requires participation of a protein called mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS). HCV evades this innate-immunity protection by cleaving MAVS (Gale and Foy 2005), and ethanol metabolism further enhances this cleavage. There are other published examples of how ethanol consumption interferes with the immune response to HCV infection (Ganesan et al. 2015; Siu et al. 2009). Thus, HCV and ethanol synergize in thwarting protective mechanisms that include both innate and adaptive immunity by increasing oxidative stress in liver cells, thereby accelerating the onset of cell death and facilitating the spread of the virus.

Current Management of ALD

There are no FDA-approved therapies for treating patients with ALD. The following therapies currently are used for optimal ALD management.

Abstinence

Drinking cessation is considered the most effective therapy in patients with ALD. Abstinence from alcohol not only resolves alcoholic steatosis but also improves survival in cirrhotic patients (Sofair et al. 2010). The effectiveness of abstinence is enhanced when it is combined with lifestyle modifications (e.g., behavioral interventions and dietary alterations) that are supervised by a nurse, primary care physician, or gastroenterologist/hepatologist (Addolorato et al. 2016; Pavlov et al. 2016).

Natural and Artificial Steroids

Corticosteroid treatment, including the use of prednisolone, has been the most extensively used form of therapy, especially for moderate to severe alcoholic hepatitis, based on their ability to suppress the immune response and proinflammatory cytokine response (Mathurin et al. 1996, 2013; Ramond et al. 1992). However, outcomes with steroids have been variable (Thursz et al. 2015). Current guidelines suggest discontinuation of therapy if there is no indication of a decrease in bilirubin levels by day 7 of treatment (European Association for the Study of the Liver 2012).

Nutritional Supplements

Nearly all patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis and cirrhosis are malnourished and their degree of malnutrition correlates with disease severity and complications, such as variceal bleeding, ascites, infections, encephalopathy, and hepatorenal syndrome (Halsted 2004; Mendenhall et al. 1995; Stickel et al. 2003). Deficiencies in micronutrients (e.g., folate, vitamin B6, vitamin A, and thiamine) and minerals (e.g., selenium, zinc, copper, and magnesium) often occur in ALD and, in some instances, are thought to be involved in its pathogenesis (Halsted 2004). According to the current guidelines of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, all patients with alcoholic hepatitis or advanced ALD should be assessed for nutritional deficiencies and treated aggressively with enteral nutritional therapy. A protein intake of 1.5 grams per kilogram bodyweight and 35 to 49 kcal per kilogram bodyweight per day is recommended for ALD patients (Frazier et al. 2011). Micronutrient supplementation should be considered if deficiencies are detected. Supplementation with one such micronutrient, zinc, has been shown to be therapeutic in animal models of alcoholic liver injury. Mechanistic studies have revealed that its protection is mediated by blocking or attenuating most mechanisms of liver injury, including increased gut permeability, oxidative stress, increased TNF production, and hepatocyte apoptosis (Mohammad et al. 2012). The few clinical studies conducted to date suggest that zinc supplementation could be an effective therapeutic approach for humans because liver function of ALD and HCV patients improved with 50 mg of elemental zinc (Mohammad et al. 2012).

Liver Transplantation

This procedure remains the standard of care for patients with end-stage liver disease. Some patients with ALD are not listed for the replacement of their own liver by a donor organ (i.e., orthotopic liver transplantation) for reasons such as continued alcohol consumption, improvement in liver function after abstinence, and a higher incidence of cancers of the upper airways and upper digestive tract. As a result, transplantation candidates with ALD often are screened for common malignancies and must undergo a formal medical and psychiatric evaluation. They also must abstain from alcohol for 6 months before being considered for liver transplantation. Data show that fewer than 20 percent of patients with histories of alcohol use as the primary cause of end-stage liver disease receive liver transplants (Lucey 2014). However, patient and organ survival is excellent in this patient population, with considerable improvement in their quality of life (Singal et al. 2012, 2013). Following transplantation, ALD patients return to consuming alcohol at rates similar to those transplanted for other reasons, although ALD patients may consume greater amounts (Bergheim et al. 2005). Because all transplant recipients exhibit increased levels of alcohol use over time, post-transplant interventions are deemed extremely valuable in supporting patients to maintain abstinence (Donnadieu-Rigole et al. 2017).

Unconventional and Herbal Remedies

Patients often turn to natural and herbal therapies based on their potential for hepatoprotection. A U.S. survey revealed that 41 percent of patients with liver disease used some form of complementary and alternative medicine. An extract of milk-thistle seeds (silymarin) and garlic were reported as the most commonly used herbs for liver disease, followed by ginseng, green tea, gingko, echinacea, and St. John’s wort (Strader et al. 2002). As indicated in a recent review (Kim et al. 2016), these and other natural medicines, including betaine, curcumin, fenugreek seed polyphenol, LIV-52, vitamin E, and vitamin C, have shown efficacy in experimental models of alcoholic liver injury but must pass the rigors of large randomized, controlled clinical trials.